EPSO verbal reasoning test: format, timing and the nine traps

By the AD5 Practice team6 min read

Also in:ItalianoEspañolFrançaisDeutschΕλληνικάRomânăPolskiPortuguês

The verbal reasoning test is 20 questions in 35 minutes, about 1 minute 45 seconds each, sat in your language 1. It is also the only Part 1 score carried into the AD5 ranking, which makes it the test to prepare hardest for. Here is how a question is built, the traps the wrong options use, a worked example and a method for the time you have.

What a question looks like

Each question is a single paragraph of general non-fiction, between about 70 and 130 words in English, on anything from science to history or economics. Below it, a fixed question asks which of four statements is correct, and exactly one of them is supported by the passage alone. No knowledge of the EU is needed. Outside knowledge can even mislead you, because the question is about what the passage says, whatever you know of the world.

In the ten verbal questions of EPSO’s public sample, the right statement is one of three kinds: a close paraphrase of one sentence, two or three facts from different sentences joined into one, or a single step of inference that the passage forces. It seldom repeats the passage word for word, so matching words is a poor guide.

Why it matters more than the other two tests

You need 10 out of 20 to pass. Only the verbal score then goes on to count: 40% of the preliminary ranking and 35% of the final ranking. Every extra verbal mark in November moves you up a list on which about 117 applicants compete for each place. The details are in how Part 1 is scored.

The nine traps in the wrong options

Every wrong option has to be provably wrong from the passage, and in practice each one fails in one of a small number of ways. These are the nine we build our own wrong options on, from a close reading of EPSO’s sample:

  1. Reversal: the statement says the opposite of the passage. The passage says rents fell after the factory closed; the option says they rose.
  2. Absolute wording: only, always, never or all, where the passage hedges. The passage says most visitors arrive by train; the option says they arrive only by train.
  3. Quantity or frequency shift: most for some, often for sometimes, many for a few.
  4. Added cause or comparison: the passage reports two facts, and the option claims that one caused the other, or that one is larger, with no basis in the text.
  5. False link: two terms that sit near each other in the passage are joined into a claim the passage never makes.
  6. Not stated: plausible, perhaps even true in the real world, and absent from the passage. The hardest to spot when the topic is familiar.
  7. Name confusion: two similar names, places or groups swapped.
  8. Merged numbers: two figures from different contexts read as a trend or a comparison.
  9. Scope shift: what was true of one region, one case or one period becomes true of the whole country, every case or all time.

A worked example

Here is a question of our own in the same format. Give yourself 1 minute 45 seconds before you open the answer.

Example: verbal reasoning (our own question)

Coastal salt marshes store carbon in their soils far faster per hectare than most forests, because waterlogged mud slows the decay of dead plant matter. A survey of the Larrow estuary found that marshes restored over the past twenty years had already reached about two thirds of the carbon density of natural marshes nearby. The restored sites with the highest densities were those flooded by the tide twice a day; sites reconnected to the sea only during spring tides gained carbon more slowly. The authors caution that rising sea levels could drown some marshes entirely, and that their figures cover the upper thirty centimetres of soil only.

Which of the following statements is supported by the passage?

  1. A)Restored marshes in the Larrow estuary now hold as much carbon per hectare as natural ones
  2. B)Of the restored marshes, the ones the tide covered most often held the most carbon per hectare
  3. C)Rising sea levels will drown some salt marshes entirely
  4. D)Salt marshes store carbon faster than most forests because their mud contains more plant matter
Show the answer and why

The answer is B.

  • B is right. The passage says the restored sites with the highest densities were those flooded twice a day, and that sites reached only by spring tides gained carbon more slowly. B joins those two facts in other words.
  • A shifts a quantity: the restored marshes had reached about two thirds of the density of natural ones, short of the same amount.
  • C turns a caution into a certainty. The authors say rising seas could drown some marshes, and “will” is a stronger claim than “could”.
  • D gives a different cause. The passage puts the fast storage down to waterlogged mud slowing decay, and says nothing about how much plant matter the mud contains.

A method for 105 seconds

  1. Read the passage once, at working speed. Note what it claims, what it only suggests, and every hedge: “some”, “may”, “most”, “often”, “about”.
  2. Take the options one at a time and look for the words in the passage that make each one true. Cross out every option you can break.
  3. Check the survivor against the exact wording. If two options survive, compare their quantifiers and their scope: one of them has stretched the passage.
  4. Move on at about two minutes. Choose your best option, bookmark the question and come back if time allows. The notice scores each test as a count of correct answers and mentions no deduction for wrong ones, so never leave a question blank.
  5. Use the answer elimination tool. The platform lets you strike out options you have ruled out, which saves reading them again.

If you sit it in Italian, or another language

The clock is the same in every language. The passages are longer in some: measured on EPSO’s own sample, they run about a fifth longer in Italian, Spanish, French, Greek and Romanian than in English. That means less time per word, so reading speed matters more. Practise in the language you will be tested in, because the traps sit in small words such as “most”, “only” and “often”, and they work a little differently in each language.

How to practise

  • Untimed first, for accuracy. Work through a set of passages with no clock and name, for every option you reject, the trap it uses. Speed comes from recognising traps quickly.
  • Then timed, 20 at a time, in 35 minutes, on screen.
  • Review every mistake, including the questions you got right by luck: find the words that decide the answer.

Each of our six mock tests contains 20 verbal questions in this format, in English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian and Spanish, with a worked answer naming the words that break every wrong option. The free test has 20 of them. For a schedule, see our three-week plan.

Free

Try a free practice test

A full-length Part 1, 40 questions in 65 minutes on three clocks, with your marks and a worked answer for every question at the end. No card needed.

Questions

How many questions are in the EPSO AD5 verbal reasoning test?

20 questions in 35 minutes, sat in your language 1. The pass mark is 10 out of 20.

How long do I have for each verbal reasoning question?

35 minutes for 20 questions is 1 minute and 45 seconds each on average. You can move freely between questions within the test, so time saved on an easy question can go to a harder one.

Does the verbal score count towards the AD5 ranking?

Yes. It is the only Part 1 score that does: 40% of the preliminary ranking and 35% of the final ranking.

Do I need to know about the EU for the verbal reasoning test?

No. The passages are general non-fiction and the answer must follow from the passage alone. Outside knowledge can lead you to a statement that is true in the world and unsupported by the text.

Sources

Every fact about the competition in this guide comes from these pages. Check them for changes before you rely on a date.

AD5 Practice is independent. It is not affiliated with EPSO, the EU institutions or the makers of the testing platform. The questions are our own.